COMDTINST 16575.1
AUG 24 1999
working relationships with Coast Guard districts, the DOD Frequency Management Agency,
and various other entities deemed necessary to assess GPS test impacts and negotiate acceptable
GPS test parameters.
a.
NAVCEN will develop specific standard operating procedures based upon general
guidelines in this Instruction. NAVCEN will receive notification of proposed testing from
the FAA and will analyze the impact on the maritime community as part of the
aforementioned IDCT process. Expected turnaround time for reply to FAA for proposed
testing will be five working days for those tests that will not affect navigable waters.
NAVCEN shall approve these requests.
b.
Each District shall designate a point of contact for maritime safety and other GPS
interference testing impact review. Should NAVCEN determine the potential exists for
testing to impinge on U.S. navigable waters, they will request a review by that District of
maritime safety impacts based upon knowledge of local conditions, types of maritime
traffic, hazardous cargoes being transported, local events, local pilot dependency upon
GPS/DGPS, planned events or operations, and other impacts of the tests. Districts shall
respond to NAVCEN within 5 days. If the District determines the impact is acceptable,
NAVCEN shall approve the request and issue appropriate Notice to Mariners.
c.
NAVCEN shall ensure that the District's point of contact is made aware of the "Cease
Buzzer" procedures in the event that the testing needs to be halted for reasons detailed later
in this Instruction.
d.
If NAVCEN's preliminary review or the Districts' impact results in a recommendation that
the testing should not be approved, NAVCEN shall refer the case to Commandant (G-OP)
for final determination. Specific examples that will require Commandant (G-OP) review
include testing that will impact a Maritime DGPS broadcast site or that will impact a major
port or waterway, such as New York Harbor, San Francisco Bay, or others.
8.
ASSESSMENT CONCERNS. There are two primary areas of concern to consider when
making an assessment of the impact of proposed GPS interference testing on the maritime
community. The first concern involves interference testing that directly affects a DGPS
broadcast site. When a DGPS broadcast site is affected, the effects of the testing extend far
beyond the originally intended test area, perhaps as much as 200 nautical miles. The second
area of concern involves interference testing affecting navigable waters. Of primary interest are
critical waterways such as harbor entrance approaches, restricted waterways in which there
exists high-density traffic involving hazardous cargoes or passenger traffic, or hazardous inlets
where vessels are known to rely on GPS/DGPS to effect a safe passage. There may be other
concerns involving either planned or emergency situations or critical operations that may be
heavily dependent upon availability of GPS/DGPS signals.
3